I don't support using GC for everything. If there is a problem that can only be solved with GC, it doesn't mean that we should express our entire running programs in terms of dynamic cyclic graphs. I believe we can do much better, with much fewer resources.
Thank you for your feedback, I appreciate it.
> C++ programmers do not have a bias against GC as a specific problem-solving technique. Expert C++ programmers can embrace GC
Please watch this portion of the video, and the way the speaker is pronouncing the word "collect":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfmTagWcqoE#t=1h5m25s
Regarding general-purpose GC:
I don't support using GC for everything. If there is a problem that can only be solved with GC, it doesn't mean that we should express our entire running programs in terms of dynamic cyclic graphs. I believe we can do much better, with much fewer resources.