Comment

Comment by rossy

Is it wrong that I really like the look of some of these? Some are garish, sure, but others like http://www.digibarn.com/collections/screenshots/KDE%202-x/kd... and http://www.digibarn.com/collections/screenshots/KDE%202-x/kd... have a professional feel that is missing in modern desktop environments. Even http://www.digibarn.com/collections/screenshots/KDE%202-x/kd... has a certain appeal to it. I miss the days when UI toolkits drew everything as grey boxes with a 3D edge. I miss Windows 9x/2000 and Mac OS 8/9 too.

I think one of the best things about early 2000-era desktop environments was that it was hard for programs to look out-of-place. In a modern desktop environment, you can easily tell the difference between programs written with different toolkits, like GTK+ and Qt. Even though each toolkit can imitate the other (there's a Adwaita theme for Qt and a Breeze theme for GTK3,) due to the complexity of modern UI themes, it's impossible to get things right and the lack of drop-shadows or animations or hover effects will leave some programs looking sub-standard. On the other hand, every developer can draw a 3D-bevelled grey box. Both GTK+ and Qt apps were made of grey boxes and they both represented each kind of widget in a pretty similar way.

parent rossy 10 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton