You really shouldn't call it “Apache <anything>” without the express approval of the Apache foundation. If you want to call it something other than “Modified Apache 2.0”, you'll have to come up with a new name.
Though what's interesting is that since the license text itself is not explicitly under any license, it's technically just under regular copyright.
Though what's interesting is that since the license text itself is not explicitly under any license, it's technically just under regular copyright.