Neither did you. That link you posted is laughable. Like there isn't a single agreeable thing about the research it presents and the methodology by which they arrive at the conclusions it makes.
> to an irrelevant authority
Is that kind of like appealing to "experience" and "team experience"?
> John Carmack doesn't do web apps, he does high-end 3D engines
Is this an admission of the possibility that types work in one subfield of programming? If so, how is that subfield different from another subfield.
Neither did you. That link you posted is laughable. Like there isn't a single agreeable thing about the research it presents and the methodology by which they arrive at the conclusions it makes.
> to an irrelevant authority
Is that kind of like appealing to "experience" and "team experience"?
> John Carmack doesn't do web apps, he does high-end 3D engines
Is this an admission of the possibility that types work in one subfield of programming? If so, how is that subfield different from another subfield.