This is a moral dichotomy that's been around for ages and I have yet to see a satisfactory answer on: are sweatshops evil because the workers are grossly underpaid and work in terrible conditions, or are they good because they're better than nothing and people will apparently starve to death otherwise?
Who should bear the responsibility of that decision? The workers? The governments of the workers? The governments of the consumers? Or the consumers?
Who should bear the responsibility of that decision? The workers? The governments of the workers? The governments of the consumers? Or the consumers?