I am confused by the comment. You think the researchers whose work Gladwell based his book on are WRONG about Gladwell getting it wrong, even though they explain the problems fairly well and you haven't addressed any of the specific points? Curious to know what qualifies you to know they have the wrong interpretation of their own work... have you even read it, or do you feel qualified to say this based on a reading of Gladwell alone?
Also, Gladwell has repeatedly "clarified", but if he didn't "get it wrong" why would there be a need to do this?
Also, Gladwell has repeatedly "clarified", but if he didn't "get it wrong" why would there be a need to do this?