Comment Comment by rohanprabhu So, I tried a simple python one-liner:[os.urandom(1)[0] < 128 for x in xrange(0, 100)]and typed 'd' for True and 'f' for False in the array, bringing the accuracy of the predictor down to 53%. Theoretically, I'm guessing doing it for large enough numbers should make it exactly 50%. parent rohanprabhu 10 years ago
[os.urandom(1)[0] < 128 for x in xrange(0, 100)]
and typed 'd' for True and 'f' for False in the array, bringing the accuracy of the predictor down to 53%. Theoretically, I'm guessing doing it for large enough numbers should make it exactly 50%.