What happens when a judge interprets the spirit of the T&C and not the letter? Is that something that a judge has the right to do?
I understand that this would most likely kill "smart contracts" (since they can just be overridden by existing legal systems...), but wouldn't it be a possible path to reclaiming the assets?
I understand that this would most likely kill "smart contracts" (since they can just be overridden by existing legal systems...), but wouldn't it be a possible path to reclaiming the assets?