How enforceable would be a classic contract that says in very fine print:
"you can put money in this account, but you are aware that this is a public account, anyone opening the account using the Recur Door can come and walk out with your money. You understand the risks that someone might do this one day"
(where the Recur Door is defined as the mechanism that guy used for this hack. Also,here instead of fine print it would be replaced by a line "you fully understand this algorithm + source code" clause)
Would it be treated the same way we would treat a honest Ponzi scheme contract ? "You can get return on investment as long as someone else invests money after you. If you happen to be the last, you're out of luck". Would such a contract be legal?
(where the Recur Door is defined as the mechanism that guy used for this hack. Also,here instead of fine print it would be replaced by a line "you fully understand this algorithm + source code" clause)
Would it be treated the same way we would treat a honest Ponzi scheme contract ? "You can get return on investment as long as someone else invests money after you. If you happen to be the last, you're out of luck". Would such a contract be legal?