Betteridge's Law of Headlines strikes again:
> Q. Do you think that if Clinton is elected we can expect to learn new information about UFOs?
> A. I highly doubt DoD or any other government agency is concealing UFO information.
> Q. Are you certain there is no government cover-up?
> A. It’s impossible to prove the negative, so all I can say is that I never saw any evidence of official interest in UFOs.
> Q. So where does this all leave us, and what is to be done?
> A. In my view, calling for the end to an alleged government UFO cover-up is almost certainly a dead end, and does not help inspire anyone in government to become more open to the topic. The UFO mystery is a scientific problem.
(That's not to say there isn't a UFO cover-up. But we're discussing this article, and the insiders' opinion is that the answer is no.)
There's also a big difference between UFO and Alien Vehicle. A UFO could be a foreign airplane, or satellite, or a weird meteor, or two birds duct-taped together.
> Q. Do you think that if Clinton is elected we can expect to learn new information about UFOs?
> A. I highly doubt DoD or any other government agency is concealing UFO information.
> Q. Are you certain there is no government cover-up?
> A. It’s impossible to prove the negative, so all I can say is that I never saw any evidence of official interest in UFOs.
> Q. So where does this all leave us, and what is to be done?
> A. In my view, calling for the end to an alleged government UFO cover-up is almost certainly a dead end, and does not help inspire anyone in government to become more open to the topic. The UFO mystery is a scientific problem.
(That's not to say there isn't a UFO cover-up. But we're discussing this article, and the insiders' opinion is that the answer is no.)
There's also a big difference between UFO and Alien Vehicle. A UFO could be a foreign airplane, or satellite, or a weird meteor, or two birds duct-taped together.