Edit: I can't reply to your reply, but I can edit this post.
Unless the form that mate selection takes radically diverges from evolved patterns I don;t see how that makes much difference. Since survival for intelligent species is much more loosely coupled to their biology I don't see why sexual selection strategies would mitigate against that. It seems to me they'd follow the same pattern in devaluing biological fitness criteria as not being as significant as they were pre-sentience.
Edit: I can't reply to your reply, but I can edit this post. Unless the form that mate selection takes radically diverges from evolved patterns I don;t see how that makes much difference. Since survival for intelligent species is much more loosely coupled to their biology I don't see why sexual selection strategies would mitigate against that. It seems to me they'd follow the same pattern in devaluing biological fitness criteria as not being as significant as they were pre-sentience.