The author puts encyclopedic knowledge and movies in the same category ("information") and seems to be arguing that they both should be freely available.
I'm not saying that current copyright system isn't completely screwed up and in need of reform, but I don't think disregarding content creators is an optimal solution.
I'm not saying that current copyright system isn't completely screwed up and in need of reform, but I don't think disregarding content creators is an optimal solution.