I had always thought that the small size of the Concorde was what made the per seat cost so expensive and held the Concorde back economically. So my expectation was that to be economically successful, you'd have to build a supersonic plane that carried more people.
Clearly you know more about this than me, but can you elaborate on why my view isn't correct?
Clearly you know more about this than me, but can you elaborate on why my view isn't correct?