It's worth noting that the same bunch of people responsible for this mistake are those who want the public to believe they're sufficiently responsible and trustworthy to:
a) Safely store and analyse the results of mass public surveillance.
b) Hold 'master' keys to encrypted systems.
Of course no-one in the know seriously believes either claim, but this is a great counter-example to put to the general public.
a) Safely store and analyse the results of mass public surveillance.
b) Hold 'master' keys to encrypted systems.
Of course no-one in the know seriously believes either claim, but this is a great counter-example to put to the general public.