Anyone have any insights into why the commonly used guns argument is not good enough for encryption? If we ban guns(encryption), only the criminals will have it.
The only thing I can think of is that the majority of people who advocate for encryption are anti-gun, and don't want to give strength to that argument?
The only thing I can think of is that the majority of people who advocate for encryption are anti-gun, and don't want to give strength to that argument?