A few years ago the Daily Mail ran an article about a visualization I made. They obeyed my CC license, so I have no complaint as serious as Yau's. But the article was just full of errors, including spelling my name wrong in three different ways. I wrote the article author and pointed out all the errors and he responded "No copy editing! It's a tight budget."
The Daily Mail truly doesn't give a shit. About quality, about copyright, about decency. It seems to be working for them.
The Daily Mail truly doesn't give a shit. About quality, about copyright, about decency. It seems to be working for them.