Comment by andrewfromx

I see this as a case of a brilliant entrepreneur (Parker) tackling the world of health care and winning. I don't view these horrible crimes he's accused of as anything other than tatics from the status-quo and his competition. It wasn't possible to get from point A to point N (where Parker took the company) without breaking these "rules" but he didn't actually break any rules because this is all new territory. Any new business "distrupting" an existing one will anger the people losing money. And they will use their lawyers and try and fight for every last dollar by claiming this "distruption" isn't legal for reason x,y,or z. David is now taking the company from point N to point Z because Parker is tainted. That's fine. I think this was always the plan. And as a shareholder I think Parker is very happy David is now CEO moving to step Z.