>Can't upvote hard enough. Applications on the web are amazing, and developers must embrace JavaScript heavily.
So how's it going in JS land, are you guys still reimplementing Windows 3.1's message passing loop and hailing it as a revolution ? :^)
Or maybe you're still busy pulling in literally 10+MBs of code on top of a 100+MB browser to fix the shortcomings of what is a terrible language ?
Or maybe you're busy trying to get performances that matches what a 68060 could do thirty years ago. Oh right, browser vendors had to agree on WASM to get OK performance. So basically, not Javascript.
But hey, I guess it's crossplatform. Kind of.
But promised, once transpilers are good enough, once I can use a good, strongly staticly typed language, once the APIs are stable and the tooling becomes tolerable, I'll join the SPA side.
So how's it going in JS land, are you guys still reimplementing Windows 3.1's message passing loop and hailing it as a revolution ? :^)
Or maybe you're still busy pulling in literally 10+MBs of code on top of a 100+MB browser to fix the shortcomings of what is a terrible language ?
Or maybe you're busy trying to get performances that matches what a 68060 could do thirty years ago. Oh right, browser vendors had to agree on WASM to get OK performance. So basically, not Javascript.
But hey, I guess it's crossplatform. Kind of.
But promised, once transpilers are good enough, once I can use a good, strongly staticly typed language, once the APIs are stable and the tooling becomes tolerable, I'll join the SPA side.