This seems to rely on assuming that the average time taken is the metric to optimize.
Imagine that you have 100 passengers, 25 of which aren't concerned with time taken, 50 of which are indifferent, and 25 of which are concerned with time taken.
With a 'walking lane', it seems to me that everyone is satisfied.
Without a walking lane, average speed improves, but those that would prefer to walk are slowed down.
I can't speak for others but I personally find the system excellent. If I'm in a rush, I can run up the stairs. If I'm not, I can chill.
I would generally be in favour of asking everyone to walk (as the below poster mentions), but that can't be expected of everyone - the disabled, elderly, children, those with suitcases, and likely other groups can't do that.
Imagine that you have 100 passengers, 25 of which aren't concerned with time taken, 50 of which are indifferent, and 25 of which are concerned with time taken.
With a 'walking lane', it seems to me that everyone is satisfied.
Without a walking lane, average speed improves, but those that would prefer to walk are slowed down.
I can't speak for others but I personally find the system excellent. If I'm in a rush, I can run up the stairs. If I'm not, I can chill.
I would generally be in favour of asking everyone to walk (as the below poster mentions), but that can't be expected of everyone - the disabled, elderly, children, those with suitcases, and likely other groups can't do that.