I find it very ironic that someone would mention Cuba in this post. Cuba is the epitome of income inequality where the ruling party (Castro and friends) controls all the capital, while the 99.9% hold virtually nothing.
You may argue there are benefits and people can be happy under a communist regime, but you cannot deny that income inequality is extremely high. If anything, your argument actually corroborates PG's statement that income inequality is not inherently bad.
You may argue there are benefits and people can be happy under a communist regime, but you cannot deny that income inequality is extremely high. If anything, your argument actually corroborates PG's statement that income inequality is not inherently bad.