>In my point of view, a person capable of such actions (despite their age) is worth the maximum sentence.
So what is your age limit? If 16, why not 15? And if 15, why not 12, or 10, or 7, or 5?
The only thing we can say with any certainty is that the Victorians tried and tested the hang-em-high method of crime reduction, with less than stellar results to show for it.
So what is your age limit? If 16, why not 15? And if 15, why not 12, or 10, or 7, or 5?
The only thing we can say with any certainty is that the Victorians tried and tested the hang-em-high method of crime reduction, with less than stellar results to show for it.