Basically new languages with strong Lisp influence.
> very much towards simplicity
Scheme maybe until the early 80s. Later it grew to Common Lisp size and beyond. See Scheme R6RS which is a complex language with tons of features and still underspecified.
> The complex, do-it-all-in-one-huge macro is a Common Lispism, not a Lispism.
Not really. Macros appeared in Lisp in the early 60s and many Lisp dialects have used it in complex ways. For example the 'famous' LOOP macro of Common Lisp actually was developed in Interlisp in the early 70s (as a part of 'Conversational Lisp' / CLISP), redesigned in Maclisp/Zetalisp and then brought into Common Lisp. The original Common Lisp in 1984 did not even have that macro in the language description, it was standardized several years later - after a search for a better alternative failed.
Basically new languages with strong Lisp influence.
> very much towards simplicity
Scheme maybe until the early 80s. Later it grew to Common Lisp size and beyond. See Scheme R6RS which is a complex language with tons of features and still underspecified.
> The complex, do-it-all-in-one-huge macro is a Common Lispism, not a Lispism.
Not really. Macros appeared in Lisp in the early 60s and many Lisp dialects have used it in complex ways. For example the 'famous' LOOP macro of Common Lisp actually was developed in Interlisp in the early 70s (as a part of 'Conversational Lisp' / CLISP), redesigned in Maclisp/Zetalisp and then brought into Common Lisp. The original Common Lisp in 1984 did not even have that macro in the language description, it was standardized several years later - after a search for a better alternative failed.