The first one looks more random to me? It has more runs. There was some article (can't remember the source) about generating a random coin flip - the way to tell the difference between a real physical coin flip and a computer is that the real physical flip will have a lot of runs, like 10 times in a row where you get heads. A computer random will attempt to "even out" the spectrum. The two images presented in the article looked similar to these but were reversed, true random looked more like a pattern, while computer generated random looked more like even noise.
TL;DR long strings of repeated results are a sign of true randomness. Am I misinterpreting the relationship between that and this article?
TL;DR long strings of repeated results are a sign of true randomness. Am I misinterpreting the relationship between that and this article?