Comment Comment by vezzy-fnord It also fails to disclaim liability, though the WTFPL does have an optional warranty disclaimer variant.And no, I don't know what planet you live in, but it's not offensive to GPL evangelists (especially not more than proprietary licenses).In fact, the big irony is that the FSF both approves the WTFPL and considers it GPL-compatible, [1] but the OSI rejects it entirely! [2]The GPL evangelists have the upper hand here.[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#WTFPL[2] http://opensource.org/minutes20090304 parent vezzy-fnord 11 years ago
And no, I don't know what planet you live in, but it's not offensive to GPL evangelists (especially not more than proprietary licenses).
In fact, the big irony is that the FSF both approves the WTFPL and considers it GPL-compatible, [1] but the OSI rejects it entirely! [2]
The GPL evangelists have the upper hand here.
[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#WTFPL
[2] http://opensource.org/minutes20090304