Comment

Comment by mattbasta

> Mozilla was in the best position to pursue FFOS in the purest possible manner

Well, maybe philosophically, but they didn't have enough influence, money, or manpower to actually make it successful. The first version of FXOS shipped without a calculator app because they couldn't work all of the bugs out. Clipboard support didn't make it until sometime around v2 or 2.5. Apps never got API support for things like front-facing cameras or bluetooth, or even access to which wifi networks were available. One constant complaint was that the Alarm app would sometimes go off at the wrong time, and sometimes not at all.

There's also other components to FXOS that simply weren't free software. The everything.me integration (which was a for-profit service baked in) was truly abhorrent. Hardware vendors refused to provide open drivers in many cases, leading to chunks of FXOS not being open source. Operators and carriers insisted on installing their own crapware on devices and forced the OS to lock them down so they couldn't be uninstalled. At the end of the day, FXOS as it was sold wasn't nearly as free as it was made out to be.

I don't want to pick on Mozilla, but despite having a great vision for FXOS they ultimately were vastly underprepared to build a solid mobile operating system. Even worse, Gary Kovacs bet the farm on FXOS and let Firefox proper rot in a corner.

You really make a tradeoff with FOSS. You can have software that's free in the most pure way possible, but it's ultimately going to be terrible unless the company putting it out is fiscally incentivized to make it great. If Acadine keeps FXOS as open as it is today, that's still a great win for the community and probably most of the users.

parent mattbasta 11 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton