> We already know that today’s energy sources cannot sustain a future we want to live in.
Is this really true? In Lazard's 2014 comparison of total cost per MWh, both wind and solar beat coal and nuclear [1]. Costs have fallen so much that it's becoming hard to justify continued subsidies [2].
Is this really true? In Lazard's 2014 comparison of total cost per MWh, both wind and solar beat coal and nuclear [1]. Costs have fallen so much that it's becoming hard to justify continued subsidies [2].
[1] http://energyinnovation.org/2015/02/07/levelized-cost-of-ene...
[2] http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/us-energy-secreta...