I'm complaining about his beating around the bush, not a reading comprehension thing. I like to know where the author stands on the topic at the outset, otherwise the article feels dishonest.
For example:
I think there are a lot of people lying to
themselves and others about their own
ancestry.
Compared to:
Isn't it interesting that so many people feel
compelled to form opinions about how we might
notice that there are statistical variances,
when comparing observable heritage, as
compared to reported heritage? I wonder why
that would be? Some might say these are
alleged fabrications, but then again this
could all be very innocent.
For example:
Compared to: