Hi there. Claim 1 is not incorrect. I am not stating executive compensation is used to claim SR&ED. I am stating it is used to suppress net profits to qualify for the higher rate. Also,
Claim 2, there is no requirement for IP to be owned by the Canadian entity for its development to be qualified for SR&ED (I’ve verified this from multiple accountants and the CRA).
As for Claim 3, you realize that this is indefinite right?
Claim 2, there is no requirement for IP to be owned by the Canadian entity for its development to be qualified for SR&ED (I’ve verified this from multiple accountants and the CRA).
As for Claim 3, you realize that this is indefinite right?