Comment

Comment by itake

I think its a combination of a few factors:

1. Older candidates are more expensive. Tech isn't that hard to learn. You can get pretty good at a particular tech within 2 years of learning it. Why pay an older candidate tons of money, when you can hire a new one that is just as good?

2. Older candidates don't know the latest tech. They spend their evenings with their families / kids whereas young folk are constantly learning the latest stacks at home.

3. Older candidates don't pass the 'beer test' with young co-founders.

parent itake 11 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton