One current dominant media narrative is that any sort of intolerant thought is intolerable, and that the emotional state of a listener is the responsibility of the speaker. There are clear problems with this point of view vis a vi reality, which is why it is a narrative, not actual reporting. This divorcing from reality allows journalists to comfortably include the narrative everywhere that it can possibly fit with no regard for the actual applicability to anything.
I suspect that overall it's about as likely to be successful as religious attempts to sell the narrative that teen sex is wrong. Shame and guilt don't really ever teach the lesson that is intended, but those are the only tools the media truly has.
I suspect that overall it's about as likely to be successful as religious attempts to sell the narrative that teen sex is wrong. Shame and guilt don't really ever teach the lesson that is intended, but those are the only tools the media truly has.