newLISP is not a derivative of Common Lisp or Scheme or any other Lisp. It's a different language in a similar style.
I wish the Common Lisp camp wasn't so insistent on equating "Lisp" to "Common Lisp." It's annoying having to tiptoe around them by saying "Lisp-like language."
I wish the Common Lisp camp wasn't so insistent on equating "Lisp" to "Common Lisp." It's annoying having to tiptoe around them by saying "Lisp-like language."