There's a subtler point: even if they are criminals, it's still valid to represent criminals to make sure that justice is served. You want criminals punished for the crimes they did commit, not the ones they didn't. You want sentencing to be fair, not vindictive. You want conspirators and other partners to be identified and to be punished too; you don't want the one unrepresented person to be coerced by everyone else's lawyers into taking all the blame. You want loopholes, as long as they exist, to be as available to the poor as to the rich.
I think I'm actually more worried about the loss of this than the loss of innocence-until-proven-guilty. That's the sort of stuff that gets people thinking, if you don't want to be extrajudicially killed on the streets, don't sell untaxed goods if you have asthma.
I think I'm actually more worried about the loss of this than the loss of innocence-until-proven-guilty. That's the sort of stuff that gets people thinking, if you don't want to be extrajudicially killed on the streets, don't sell untaxed goods if you have asthma.