Is there a concept in law as "you should have known"? Like, its one thing to not know that the thing you are saying isn't true (i.e. "my co-founder went to Yale" when he actually believes that he did).
But another to not know the definitions of words you are using when you should know that? Can you say "I have a million dollars in the bank" when you honestly believe "a million" = 1000?
But another to not know the definitions of words you are using when you should know that? Can you say "I have a million dollars in the bank" when you honestly believe "a million" = 1000?